Fantasy Forecaster: Nov. 18-24
By Neil Tardy | Special to ESPN.com
In our mock games, small sample sizes are often misleading. But skewed stats can still be pretty fun.
For instance, as the ESPN.com fantasy hoops analyst tasked with examining NBA teams by their defensive numbers, I'm floored by the Indiana Pacers' torrid start. In winning their first eight games, they've allowed by far the fewest points: just 84.5 per game. Not only are the Pacers the lone NBA team holding its opposition under 85 points, but they're also the only team holding opponents under 90 points. In addition, the Pacers limit opponents to a league-low 39.2 percent shooting while posting the second-highest rebound differential (plus-5.2) and amassing an astounding 8.8 blocked shots per game.
Sure, as of Friday, none of the Pacers' victims had a winning record -- and it's possible they won't see a plus-.500 club until their 14th game, at home against the Minnesota Timberwolves on Nov. 25. However, given what we know about these players, it's a safe assumption that the Pacers will be an elite defensive team this season, and a fantasy matchup worth avoiding whenever possible.
The Pacers are at or near the top in most defensive categories. This includes 3-pointers against, currently allowing the fourth-fewest made 3s and the second-fewest 3-point tries. Surprisingly though, the team yielding the fewest treys so far is the Boston Celtics, with just 4.2 per game. What's interesting about that is that Celtics opponents are averaging just 14.4 attempts from downtown -- almost 2.0 shots fewer than the Pacers' hapless opponents are trying.
I suspect the Celtics' staunch defense against the 3 is an aberration. But let's see how the Portland Trail Blazers -- who are averaging the fifth-most triples -- fare against them Friday.
[h=3]Week 4 at a Glance[/h]
This would be a good week to talk about the Los Angeles Clippers -- except, from a fantasy standpoint, you know what you're getting. In Week 4, the Clippers play five times -- a phenomenon I've taken to calling a Wonderful Calendar Coincidence (WCC). The problem in this case, of course, is that every Clipper of fantasy relevance is already rostered in every league. So to the owners of Chris Paul, Blake Griffin, J.J. Redick, Jamal Crawford and DeAndre Jordan, enjoy this twist in the schedule. The rest of us will just wait for the next WCC. (Hint: It will arrive in time for Christmas.)
This would also be a good week to talk about the Los Angeles Lakers -- except, from a schedule standpoint, they play just twice in Week 4. Yes, Jordan Hill (19.5 points, 13.0 rebounds and 2.0 blocks in his first two starts) may be worth adding. Steve Blake (13.2 points, 7.8 assists and 2.8 3-pointers in his past five) is absolutely worth adding while Steve Nash is sidelined. Mike D'Antoni once made Chris Duhon fantasy-relevant. He can surely do the same for Blake. But both should stick to your bench for Week 4. Joining the Lakers in a week of relative idleness are the New Orleans Pelicans and the Toronto Raptors. Just to reiterate what you're already thinking, even with two games, you'll have no qualms about starting Anthony Davis.
<STYLE type=text/css>.mod-inline td img {margin: 0px;}</STYLE>
<THEAD>
</THEAD><TBODY>
</TBODY>"R" matchup ratings are based on a scale from 1 (poor matchup) to 10 (excellent matchup), and are calculated using a formula that evaluates the team's year-to-date and past 10 games' statistics, their opponents' numbers in those categories, and their performance in home/road games depending on where the game is to be played. The column to the right lists the team's total number of games scheduled (G) as well as home games (H), and lists the overall rating from 1 to 10 for that team's weekly schedule (R).
By Neil Tardy | Special to ESPN.com
In our mock games, small sample sizes are often misleading. But skewed stats can still be pretty fun.
For instance, as the ESPN.com fantasy hoops analyst tasked with examining NBA teams by their defensive numbers, I'm floored by the Indiana Pacers' torrid start. In winning their first eight games, they've allowed by far the fewest points: just 84.5 per game. Not only are the Pacers the lone NBA team holding its opposition under 85 points, but they're also the only team holding opponents under 90 points. In addition, the Pacers limit opponents to a league-low 39.2 percent shooting while posting the second-highest rebound differential (plus-5.2) and amassing an astounding 8.8 blocked shots per game.
Sure, as of Friday, none of the Pacers' victims had a winning record -- and it's possible they won't see a plus-.500 club until their 14th game, at home against the Minnesota Timberwolves on Nov. 25. However, given what we know about these players, it's a safe assumption that the Pacers will be an elite defensive team this season, and a fantasy matchup worth avoiding whenever possible.
The Pacers are at or near the top in most defensive categories. This includes 3-pointers against, currently allowing the fourth-fewest made 3s and the second-fewest 3-point tries. Surprisingly though, the team yielding the fewest treys so far is the Boston Celtics, with just 4.2 per game. What's interesting about that is that Celtics opponents are averaging just 14.4 attempts from downtown -- almost 2.0 shots fewer than the Pacers' hapless opponents are trying.
I suspect the Celtics' staunch defense against the 3 is an aberration. But let's see how the Portland Trail Blazers -- who are averaging the fifth-most triples -- fare against them Friday.
[h=3]Week 4 at a Glance[/h]
This would be a good week to talk about the Los Angeles Clippers -- except, from a fantasy standpoint, you know what you're getting. In Week 4, the Clippers play five times -- a phenomenon I've taken to calling a Wonderful Calendar Coincidence (WCC). The problem in this case, of course, is that every Clipper of fantasy relevance is already rostered in every league. So to the owners of Chris Paul, Blake Griffin, J.J. Redick, Jamal Crawford and DeAndre Jordan, enjoy this twist in the schedule. The rest of us will just wait for the next WCC. (Hint: It will arrive in time for Christmas.)
This would also be a good week to talk about the Los Angeles Lakers -- except, from a schedule standpoint, they play just twice in Week 4. Yes, Jordan Hill (19.5 points, 13.0 rebounds and 2.0 blocks in his first two starts) may be worth adding. Steve Blake (13.2 points, 7.8 assists and 2.8 3-pointers in his past five) is absolutely worth adding while Steve Nash is sidelined. Mike D'Antoni once made Chris Duhon fantasy-relevant. He can surely do the same for Blake. But both should stick to your bench for Week 4. Joining the Lakers in a week of relative idleness are the New Orleans Pelicans and the Toronto Raptors. Just to reiterate what you're already thinking, even with two games, you'll have no qualms about starting Anthony Davis.
<STYLE type=text/css>.mod-inline td img {margin: 0px;}</STYLE>
<CENTER></CENTER> | Team | <CENTER>Mon 11/18</CENTER> | <CENTER>Tue 11/19</CENTER> | <CENTER>Wed 11/20</CENTER> | <CENTER>Thu 11/21</CENTER> | <CENTER>Fri 11/22</CENTER> | <CENTER>Sat 11/23</CENTER> | <CENTER>Sun 11/24</CENTER> | <CENTER></CENTER> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta HAWKS | OFF | @MIA R: 5 | DET R: 7 | OFF | @DET R: 7 | BOS R: 5 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 8 |
| Boston CELTICS | OFF | @HOU R: 6 | @SA R: 2 | OFF | IND R: 1 | @ATL R: 5 | OFF | G: 4 H: 1 R: 5 |
| Brooklyn NETS | POR R: 5 | OFF | @CHA R: 7 | OFF | @MIN R: 6 | OFF | DET R: 6 | G: 4 H: 2 R: 8 |
| Charlotte BOBCATS | @CHI R: 1 | OFF | BKN R: 1 | OFF | PHX R: 3 | @MIL R: 4 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 4 |
| Chicago BULLS | CHA R: 4 | OFF | OFF | @DEN R: 6 | @POR R: 6 | OFF | @LAC R: 4 | G: 4 H: 1 R: 6 |
| Cleveland CAVALIERS | OFF | OFF | WSH R: 3 | OFF | @NO R: 5 | @SA R: 3 | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 3 |
| Dallas MAVERICKS | PHI R: 8 | OFF | HOU R: 8 | OFF | UTA R: 7 | @DEN R: 7 | OFF | G: 4 H: 3 R: 9 |
| Denver NUGGETS | @OKC R: 7 | OFF | OFF | CHI R: 6 | OFF | DAL R: 10 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Detroit PISTONS | OFF | NY R: 4 | @ATL R: 5 | OFF | ATL R: 5 | OFF | @BKN R: 4 | G: 4 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Golden State WARRIORS | @UTA R: 8 | OFF | MEM R: 4 | OFF | @LAL R: 9 | POR R: 7 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 8 |
| Houston ROCKETS | OFF | BOS R: 8 | @DAL R: 10 | OFF | OFF | MIN R: 9 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 7 |
| Indiana PACERS | OFF | OFF | @NY R: 5 | OFF | @BOS R: 6 | PHI R: 7 | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 4 |
| Los Angeles CLIPPERS | MEM R: 7 | OFF | @MIN R: 9 | @OKC R: 7 | OFF | SAC R: 10 | CHI R: 8 | G: 5 H: 3 R: 10 |
| Los Angeles LAKERS | OFF | OFF | OFF | OFF | GS R: 5 | OFF | SAC R: 8 | G: 2 H: 2 R: 2 |
| Memphis GRIZZLIES | @LAC R: 4 | OFF | @GS R: 5 | OFF | SA R: 2 | OFF | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 3 |
| Miami HEAT | OFF | ATL R: 8 | @ORL R: 8 | OFF | OFF | ORL R: 8 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Milwaukee BUCKS | OFF | OFF | POR R: 4 | OFF | @PHI R: 6 | CHA R: 5 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 4 |
| Minnesota TIMBERWOLVES | OFF | @WSH R: 7 | LAC R: 3 | OFF | BKN R: 3 | @HOU R: 8 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 7 |
| New Orleans PELICANS | OFF | OFF | UTA R: 5 | OFF | CLE R: 6 | OFF | OFF | G: 2 H: 2 R: 1 |
| New York KNICKS | OFF | @DET R: 6 | IND R: 1 | OFF | OFF | @WSH R: 4 | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 3 |
| Oklahoma City THUNDER | DEN R: 10 | OFF | OFF | LAC R: 8 | OFF | OFF | UTA R: 10 | G: 3 H: 3 R: 7 |
| Orlando MAGIC | OFF | OFF | MIA R: 3 | OFF | OFF | @MIA R: 4 | PHX R: 5 | G: 3 H: 2 R: 3 |
| Philadelphia 76ERS | @DAL R: 6 | OFF | TOR R: 4 | OFF | MIL R: 6 | @IND R: 1 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 5 |
| Phoenix SUNS | OFF | @SAC R: 8 | SAC R: 7 | OFF | @CHA R: 7 | OFF | @ORL R: 6 | G: 4 H: 1 R: 9 |
| Portland TRAIL BLAZERS | @BKN R: 4 | OFF | @MIL R: 6 | OFF | CHI R: 2 | @GS R: 4 | OFF | G: 4 H: 1 R: 6 |
| Sacramento KINGS | OFF | PHX R: 5 | @PHX R: 4 | OFF | OFF | @LAC R: 2 | @LAL R: 5 | G: 4 H: 1 R: 6 |
| San Antonio SPURS | OFF | OFF | BOS R: 6 | OFF | @MEM R: 5 | CLE R: 8 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 5 |
| Toronto RAPTORS | OFF | OFF | @PHI R: 6 | OFF | WSH R: 4 | OFF | OFF | G: 2 H: 1 R: 1 |
| Utah JAZZ | GS R: 4 | OFF | @NO R: 5 | OFF | @DAL R: 6 | OFF | @OKC R: 3 | G: 4 H: 1 R: 6 |
| Washington WIZARDS | OFF | MIN R: 5 | @CLE R: 5 | OFF | @TOR R: 3 | NY R: 3 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 6 |
<THEAD>
</THEAD><TBODY>
</TBODY>
<CENTER>Ratings color scale</CENTER> |
---|